Friday, February 23, 2007

From An Old Classmate

So I have been involved in facebook world (an online community) and have been enjoying it... Mostly because I get messages like these from random people that I graduated with from high school! Leo, if you are reading this... I can't wait to connect brother!


Message from Leo Chen (Grand Valley State)
Yesterday at 11:34 pm

From: Leo Chen (Grand Valley State)
To: Nick Warnes
Subject:
Message: Wow, you went to seminary school? i'm in complete shock, that's amazing nick! it really is. that's such a God thing....

Thursday, February 22, 2007

The History of Sex Rights

We had a lovely conversation today in class regarding the history of marriage. It is really a captivating subject as we begin to ask questions about marriage, wedding, engagement, sex, law, land rights and many more... Here is an outline of the notes on the history and development of marriage. You might find some interesting pieces in here... (I can't maintain the skeleton of the outline so just pay attention to the numbers and roman numerals...)


III. History of the Wedding Rite
A. Our weddings customs today are a strange mix of theology, superstition and law.
B. Jewish antecedents
1. Marriage though sacred was not ritualized in a sacred way, Jewish weddings in the main are primarily secular events
2. One would be betrothed or committed to another and would often begin living together
3. Marriage was the celebration of this promise that was celebrated for days, as people would come in as travel allowed.
C. Roman Antecedents
1. Marriage was simply a promise made by two individuals to each other
2. Often this was done in a ritual context, but it was not necessary
3. One would have a ceremony of betrothal (we now call engagement) which would make promises of future wedding plans along with an exchange of rings
4. The wedding rite began at the home of the bride where the couple would join hand and make vows, offer a sacrifice on the family altar, then would proceed to the home of the new couple for a banquet with a wedding cake, and marriage bed rites (with hopes for male children)
D. Late influences
1. When the feudal realities of life began to creep in, the marriage rite became a nexus of economic and familial exchange, the bonding of tribes through the sharing of property which included the bride (think of Monty Python & Holy Grail)
*Clerical celibacy should be seen as the church's way of doing damage control with the distribution of parish land
2. Here you have the giving away of the bride, fertility rites (rice), veiling the bride and adding bridesmaids to confuse evil spirits (later during the plague the best people would replace the spouse in event of death)
3. Weddings were secular rites, Christians were to use them and to marry other Christians in them but they took place in homes and taverns and not churches
E. Church involvement
1. As the medieval era progressed, legal issues became more essential, particularly proof of marriage
2. For proof of marriage the wealthy had wedding portraits painted, the poor needed simply a written document, and often the only literate person was the clergy (which literally means "learned")
3. By about 1100 the service went something like this:
a. Rite of consent with ring outside of church, at times at the church door
b. Procession into church
c. Nuptial mass with nuptial blessing just before the fraction
d. Blessing of bed in the home
4. The marriage rite was essentially a legal exchange with the vows becoming an irrevocable contract.
F. Elements of Rite
1. Betrothal
2. Bans
3. Vows
4. Nuptial Blessing
5. Relationship between wedding and reception
6. Relationship between wedding and marriage
a. Process not moment
b. Ritualize the process
IV. Interpretation of the practice
A. Anthropology from Aristotle through Augustine to Thomas
B. Women were seen as incomplete men though possessing a rational soul they were created essentially for their womb.
C. For example, Adam was created independent, Eve was dependent.
D. Man is active, woman is passive
E. Adam only needed Eve for procreation, and women are saved through child bearing (1 Tim 2:15)
F. Women were less like God in nature, not a head or leader, hence are excluded from orders
G. Some even suggested that women could not be saved because they were too carnal
*Jewish anthropology
H. Virginity was a woman’s attempt to become more male by attempting to control their desires.
I. Following Greek society Women are domestic, men are social
J. Marriage was essentially a change of state for the woman and not the man
K. In a day and age when women were seriously devalued, they were "queen for a day" at their wedding
L. Theology
1. Marriage as a sacrament has a difficult history as the sacrality of the sacraments is too muddled in the sinful carnage of sex
2. Marriage was seen as a remedy for concupiscence, or diminishing lust
3. In the scholastic period it was often seen in a negative light.
4. Marriage as a natural or physical relation was the consent one gave to have sex with another.
5. Marriage as a sacrament was a consent for sex as well as the union of souls
6. Still, the union was of greater to lesser
M. Today we think of gender differently, yet we preserve many of the same rites and even language (ie: giving the bride away)
N. How much of the tradition do we keep, reject or redeem?

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Sex God

I just picked up Rob Bell's new book called Sex God today at Fuller's book store. Rob Bell has been one of the most influencial voices in my life and I enjoyed his first book called Velvet Elvis. While I have not yet read more than a couple pages of the new book, I am anticipating how the mysteriously close connection between God and sexuality will be addressed in his writing. If you get a chance, pick it up. One thing is certain about this text... It will call for conversation.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

A Big Winner!


I just recieved a phone call that will forever change the lives of Whitney and I. I couldn't believe that he was calling. I mean, we put our name in the drawing, but I've never heard of anybody really winning a prize like this. I started talking with him and sure enough... Yep... He let me know... I had won free Chipotle for a year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Serisouly... Whitney and I entered a drawing yesterday at lunch at the new Chipotle in Pasadena and we actually won. So free Chipotle all around for anyone who ends up in Los Angeles!

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Approaching the Text

Taking a New Testament course focused on Acts through Revelation at Fuller Seminary will naturally lead anyone into a study of Paul. From the reading that I have been doing, my interest has peaked and I have been approaching some incredible questions that have been paramount for me in adding more depth to the written Word…
Why does Paul rarely talk about the Kingdom of God (Jesus' favorite topic...)? Why does Paul always use the title "Christ" (when Jesus never uses it...)? How do Paul's Pharisaical tendencies manifest themselves in his theology and then into his writing? How did Paul's Hellenistic (Greek) culture, ruled by the Roman Emperor, with huge Jewish influences impact his thoughts on Jesus? How is the "old perspective" and the "new perspective" on Paul to be approached as we share the Gospel? Why did Paul rarely quote Jesus? Why are the three Damascus road accounts in the book of Acts share such differing views? How are we to handle Paul's Damascus experience as written in Galatians compared to his Damascus experience in Acts 9? Which is the primary account of Paul's life, Acts or his letters? Why does he seem so different in Acts and in his letters? And the biggest questions for me surround what we are to do with Israel and God's promises to Israel in light of Paul’s conversion? Did Paul still embrace his Pharisaic Judaism? Did Paul want to start a new faith away from Judaism? Was he trying to reform Judaism?
The beautiful part behind this class is that answers are not valued. (At Fuller there is probably a 50/50 split between people who value answers and people who value questions.) The questions are especially beautiful in this class because there are so many wise approaches to answering these questions. If there was only one answer given to some of these questions, then wisdom from many voices of historical Christianity would be left out. The depth intertwined in the written Word and these historical voices continue to inspire me as I study different forms of criticism (form, redaction, historical, narrative) and get to know different players in new ways who have contributed to God's written Word. Their personalities shine. For so long I was instructed that the Holy Spirit was the force whom penned the text. Recognizing that God used not only the Holy Spirit, but also these men, and there personalities, and their character, and their Meyer Briggs polarities, and their passions, and their beliefs, to form this mysterious Word, compels me. It compels me that we too get to participate in this reality that we find ourselves in...What a gift that God includes us in the formation of history! What a gift that God loves the world! What a gift that we, the church, get to partner with God to share God's love for the world and for individuals who dwell in this world. For a long time now, it has been appropriate to completely remove and objectify oneself as one approaches the text. This was seen as the best way to “know” the text. What a gift it is that we live in a culture that values the subjective connection of our story into God's past, present and future story! Participation is no longer seen as sinful, while the opposite is. Thanks be to God.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

A Visit to the Place We Dwell

Last Monday my parents arrived in Pasadena. We packed a ton of excitement into three days of spending time with one another. On Monday we went to In and Out and Whitney took them to Paseo Colorado while I was at class. On Tuesday, while my dad was doing buisness in LA, I took my mom to her first graduate class. She enjoyed the thinking and especially liked the professor. Tuesday afternoon, while Whitney was at work, I showed my parents around Old Town and as soon as Whitney got out of work we hopped on the train and headed down to Hollywood to see Jimmy Kimmel. TO make a long story short, they let 250 in to watch the show and we were numbers 251-254! It was so tragic that it was funny! So while we didn't end up getting in the show, we did have a fun time at Philipes and walking around Hollywood. Wednesday morning my dad and I teed off at 6:30 in the morning and while we froze our tails off during the first 9 holes, we thawed out in the back nine and had a great time. I cooked a big dinner on Wednesday night as we celebrated Whitney's birthday and then we sent my parents on their way on Thursday morning. It was short and sweet, but the conversations were wonderful and we got to give my parents at least a taste of the place in which we dwell.




Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Jimmy Kimmel

If you get a chance this evening, be sure to watch Jimmy Kimmel Live on ABC at midnight. My parents are in town and we are going to take them down to Hollywood to see the show!

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Apologizing to a Generation

Kids used to be the most important resource for a culture to accumulate. Kids meant security, hope, family, and most of all a future. Over the past fifty years, things have changed. Kids are no longer the most important resource in our American culture. In fact... kids are quite the opposite. Kids are now seen as hurdles to gaining more important resources like cars, vacations, homes, and of course financial security. Kids get in the way of members of the American culture growing their own personal Kingdoms and have therefore been left abandoned by adults. Adults have left kids, especially adolescents to fend for themselves. To prove themselves to be worthy to assimilate into a culture of personal Kingdom growers. Adult number one would say to child number one, "If you do well, if you get this degree, if you make this grade, if you attain to this standard, then I will count you worthy as a personal Kingdom grower as well and you can be just like me." I'm sorry to this generation. We have abandoned you and left you to fend for yourself. I'm sorry for the pain that this has caused in your life and in the life of those whom surround you. I'm sorry to the person who sent me this e-mail after hearing that I was the new guy at GPC through an e-mail that I had sent to all students.

"Does this mean you're going to be the new youth pastor? How long do you intend on staying?"

How long do you intend on staying... I'm sorry that it is so right of you to ask this question. There is something dehumanizing about this situation. Whar are we doing to our students? We are sorry.