Glen Hansard

Don't be decieved by the intro. For those of you Barth followers, may this song bend you towards Brunner and deepen your understanding of Natural theology and common grace.

2000 Miles East

My conversations have recently been filled with reflections surrounding our 2000 mile trip back to Michigan. During the first few minutes of Monday morning, Whitney and I will be hopping on a red eye to head to the state in which we used to dwell. We plan on heading right up to the cottage to spend quality time with family adn then to finish our trip back in the G Rap. I know that blogs wear out these lists, but I am feeling a list. Yep, 10 points. 10 points of anticipation in heading back to the mitten.

10. 20 hours of fishing. 3 Bass.










9. 2 AM on the porch.
8. 6 AM on the porch.
7. 1 inch from the Meat Shack.
6. Fire flys.





5. 300 dollars worth of illegal fireworks.
4. Watching everyone else get to 21 points with plenty of ringers.
3. Floating with hot dogs.
2. Jones' Ice Cream. (I would put a picture here but after searching for 10 minutes, I don't think that there is a picture of it on the web. Something to put on the to do list while in MI!)
1. Creating eternal memories with the people I love. Duh.

A Poppy God?

For the past 8 days I have been in an intensive class with Dr. Craig Detweiler and his reflections over the relationships between pop culture and theology. We ahve covered celebrity, advertising, music, film, and tv, fashion, and sports are still to come. With the outstanding amount of time that we, as Americans, spend swimming in popular culture, this subject is growing in importance. I have added some of the highlights of the class.



-Nieburs categories of how the church hsa dealt with culture
-Avoidance
-Christ vs. Culture
-Caution
-Christ and culture in paradox
-Dialogue
-Christ transforms culture
-Appropriation
-Christ of Culture
-Divine Encounter
-Christ above Culture



-Leonard Sweet and the four options of changing church in a post-modern culture.
-Preserving the church. (Orthodox)
-Same message, new methods. (Mosaic)
-Changing the message and preserving the methods. (Episcopal)
-Change method and message. (McLaren)



Sufjan Stevens (Music)


Donnie Darcko (Film)


Apple (Advertising)


Rosie vs. Elizabeth


Christianity Today's Movie of the Year


Dancer in the Dark (Bjork)

Upside Down Church

Maybe this piece of art captures the future work of the church.

Sidewalk Art

Last night Whitney and I ventured down to Paseo Colorado to view the sidewalk art that hundreds of artists had been working on all weekend. We did not know what to expect, but loved the experience. As George Steiner says, "When it comes to music, words are lame." Also, might I add, when it comes to art, words are lame, so I will just throw a bunch of pictures on here of the art... Enjoy! (Be sure to click on the pictures to make them bigger...) (I put our favorite one on the top left... This piece won second place.)

Dodgers and Michael B.

We were given some remarkable Dodger tickets for last nights game. We were about 30 rows up from field level, right behind home plate... I don't know if I have ever been that close to the action for a game and I appreciated the view. We could hear the players, and I could see more of the minute details of the game. The Dodgers won, and we had a lovely time with some new friends Paul and Kelly. I also hung out with Michael Bredeweg this afternoon, an old friend from Hudsonville, who is in town for the Student Leadership Project (SLP). SLP is put on through Fuller Seminary and Young Life and is a marvelous program that helps students to dream big regarding their leadership within the Kingdom. Michael is a great guy and I especially enjoyed catching up with him.

VerNoNo

How about Verlander last night... What a joy!

Top Ten of Spring 2007

With another quarter in hindsight, I thought that a top ten list may be appropriate for our first spring in Pasadena.

10.) The bloom of the Jacaranda trees that line the streets of Pasadena.

9.) Seeing friends graduate and move all over the world.
8.) Whitney's big promotion at Fuller.
7.) J.J.'s steakhouse happy hour. (One dollar filet mignon quesadillas!)
6.) Learning (Working through abusive systems, the history of art and the church, writing provacative papers for systematics 1, and finishing greek!)
5.) Joining 24 Hour Fitness (I am still fat.)

4.) Further developing relationships at GPC.
3.) Beginning to dream about the possibilities of life after Fuller.
2.) More quality time with Whitney. (This picture was taken at the Walt Disney Concert Hall in L.A. where we heard the Los Angeles Philharmonic.)

1.) Better learning with Whitney about the importance of rejoicing always, and the depth of what rejoicing really means.

The Final Cut

Here is the final cut of the film that Beau and I made. Beau's music has been properly mixed and I made some adjustments on the editing. Posted below is a reflection on this piece of art.


Beau and I began to dream about what an art piece might look like if we were to combine some of our gifts and talents that we had previously been given the opportunity to cultivate. I knew that Beau was a gifted musician and I informed Beau that I liked to dabble in post-production editing and film. We dialogued about what a short film might look like specifically for this class. We reflected upon ecclesiology, modern art, postmodern art, Jesus, and eventually landed upon a shared passion that both of us possess. Worship. We wanted to create a modern day icon not only about worship, but also for worship. We envisioned a creation of a window to heaven for this class and also for our own local church bodies. As we continued to dialogue we soon realized that the problem would not be coming up with material to put in the short film, but rather to narrow our ideas into a film that would be less than five minutes long. We narrowed by recognizing a shared passion for embracing the beauty of worship within different traditions. The idea was made complete when we decided to attempt to articulate the richness of worship within different traditions as all five human senses are engaged.
The Protestant American Church does not do well in engaging all five human senses. There is very little space within protestant worship for the visual. Through the interpretation of John Calvin, and his focus on the hearing of the Word of God over and against visual mediums within worship, protestant churches are filled with barren walls. This has also been the experience of Beau and I within our own respective churches. Services are filled with words, but often lack the language of visual imagery. Especially the language of art. Beau and I both agree that art has a place within the liturgy of our Sunday morning worship and we felt that a film, with the primary medium of the visual, could be a beneficial step in moving in more of a positive direction with using art in worship.
In order for this piece of art to be efficient in moving our own local church bodies in a positive direction, we knew that the piece would have to be aesthetically pleasing. George Steiner defines aesthetic. “Embody concentrated, selective interactions between the constraints of the observed and the boundless possibilities of the imagined.” Thus we wanted this film to capture the imagination of the viewers. As I edited the various photos together, I could feel the limits of each individual picture. Yet from talking to others who have already seen the film, and as I observe the film, I can literally feel how the intertwining of all of the different aesthetics of the piece, the movement, the words, the music, the texture, the effects, and the individual pictures call viewers into a state of imagination. While the individual pictures were very limited in their ability to aesthetically capture the viewer, the while of the project captures a piece of the cosmic story and calls viewers into a deeper state of imagination. This is beauty to Beau and I. Beauty calls people into a state of imagination.
We feel that the idea of beauty calls us to a series of difficult questions. What is beautiful? Is beauty truly in the eye of the beholder? Or does beauty have a consistency within its ethos? In his book Visual Faith, William A. Dyrness writes…

“An examination of some of the biblical language fro beauty reveals that beauty is connected both to God’s presence and activity and to the order that God has given to creation.“

It our belief that this piece, Sensing Worship, was and continues to be connected to God’s presence and activity and thus contains beauty. We also believe that this piece is beautiful because of the order that it contains. The consistent rhythm of the song, the movement of images, the steady communication of the lyrics, and the focused message of the art all contribute to its beauty. While God’s activity and order do not encompass the totality of its beauty, the art is connected to God and possesses order and thus has components of beauty within it. This beauty then leads not only to imagination, but also to action.
Our desire in creating this film was to open a window to heaven. The transcendent space that is offered through art exists for more than just the space of transcendence. This space is sacred as it calls us into action. It is the hope of Beau and I that Sensing Worship will call people to a new depth of understanding and practice in worship. We hope that this film inspires both worshippers and those who plan worship to take more into account each of our God given senses. Engaging these senses will better allow God to connect with worshippers and will give the Holy Spirit space to call people deeper into love for God and love for neighbor. Ultimately we hope that this window to heaven acts as a catalyst in creating space to allow people to worship deeper into spirit and truth, which will then lead to the expansion of the Kingdom of Heaven in all of the communities that surround each of the respective viewers.
In a world where we are increasingly surrounded by films created for the sole purpose of entertainment and for creating a financial profit, we deeply desire for this film to do more than simply entertain. I don’t think that I could say it better than Rookmaaker in his book Modern Art and the Death of a Culture.

“They depict as true a world which is limited and superficial, one without God, without the deeper questions in man’s heart, without real matters of life and death, for life and death are reduced to sentiment, or adventures, or crime and violence or cruelty, without any sort of judgment passed.”

We especially love Rookmaaker’s thought that many films do not capture the deeper questions within the heart of humanity. For it is in the questions that we journey deeper into Truth. What Beau and I find most interesting is that answers aren’t necessarily the end point of the journey of questions. We think that the deepest levels of Truth and reality are often found in the process of living out the deepest questions of humanities heart. Thus our hope is that this piece of art calls people not to concrete answers, but to conversations and to spaces where questions about worship, reality and God can be lived out.
So as we continue to have consistent conversations with people in our respective congregations about worship, we hope that this film may enable people to live deeper into their questions not only about worship, but ultimately about reality, which we believe is best encountered in God. As worship leaders, Beau and I have learned that people are consistently frustrated with Sunday morning congregational worship. While there are many factors to this frustration for the average worshipper in America, we feel that a significant portion of this frustration comes because of our handicapped senses in the average protestant worship space. Protestants have not been freed to release all senses in worship and have been trained to highly prioritize only listening to the written Word of God. We have also been trained to numb all other senses in order that we might best be able to hear the Word. George Steiner brilliantly wrote in Real Presences “that when it speaks of music, language is lame.” Might we add that when it speaks of worship, engaging only one sense is lame. Ultimately when only a one sense is engaged to encounter the ultimate reality of God, the encountering is lame. And if our articulation of God and reality is lame, then the natural outflow of worship will also be lame.
Thus, as we attempted to do in Sensing Worship, we must consistently engage all senses in worship in order to better engage reality. This articulation will better lead to order and to beauty and to imagination and then to action. If we do not engage all five senses in worship we will be left with lame worship. And lame worship will then lead to a lame sense of beauty, which will then lead to a lame sense of imagination, which will then lead to lame action, which will naturally communicate with the world that we worship a lame God who has a lame love for humanity. Deep within, the average worshipper in America knows that God’s love for the world is not lame. May Sensing Worship be a window into heaven that calls people to better encounter God and to better distribute the depth of God’s love for the world.

L.A. Times

Be sure to check out Column One of the L.A. Times as printed yesterday!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-scholer5jun05,0,1943101.story?coll=la-home-center

The L.A. Times did a lovely article on Dr. David Schoeler, a professor here at Fuller. David and his wife Jeanette have been extremely encouraging to Whitney and I in our time here at Fuller. We have learned so much from them and look forward to continuing to learn from them in the future. (Be sure to look closely at the pictures that were in the paper as well! You might recognize a couple of people...)

Final Project

For the final project in my Art and Theology class with Dr. Bill Dyrness, a new friend (Beaux Wammack) and I decided that we might make a musical film representing the beauty of the engaging of all senses in worship. I hope that you enjoy...